Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 23:24:00 +0200 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Recent dialog4ports update Message-ID: <CAF6rxgkiG0dmhqy8bQ16KJdV5=qEBsAb3A%2BRVgCmfe17mP4AwA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1siXj3%2BpDdLNfKkpQdPMw%2Bgv18VTaN4jzZQLo4GeDpYXA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAN6yY1siXj3%2BpDdLNfKkpQdPMw%2Bgv18VTaN4jzZQLo4GeDpYXA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> wrote: > First, thanks for the recent change to dialog4ports to tag new options with > a '+'. It's a feature I have wanted for a long time! > > But I see the ports(7) man page has not been updated with any of this > information. It still claims that ports uses dialog(1) There is no > indication of this in dialog4ports(1), which mostly just points people at > dialog(1). Of course, the dialog(1) page says nothing about it nor does > UPDATING. I had to find it in svn commits. Most users will probably never > look there. fwiw, CHANGES does mention it, but this is a developer's file not a user's file. I just modified the ports man page in HEAD and will MFC it shortly. However, because the ports system is decoupled from base the man page tends to get out of date fairly easily. :( -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgkiG0dmhqy8bQ16KJdV5=qEBsAb3A%2BRVgCmfe17mP4AwA>