Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:23:32 +0200
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
To:        Dan Naumov <dan.naumov@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, mandrews@bit0.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, rnoland@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 8.0-RELEASE / gpart / GPT / marking a partition as "active"
Message-ID:  <4B5622D4.2070602@icyb.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <cf9b1ee01001191309u66492d80rd1500329deceb6d1@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <cf9b1ee01001190911r52e51f1dn46bdeda4e15c1c97@mail.gmail.com>	 <4B55FF44.4040308@icyb.net.ua> <cf9b1ee01001191309u66492d80rd1500329deceb6d1@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
on 19/01/2010 23:09 Dan Naumov said the following:
>> After using gpart to create the GPT (and thus the PMBR and its
>> bootcode), why not simply use "fdisk -a -1 DISKNAME" to set the PMBR
>> partition active?
> 
> According to the fdisk output, the partition flag did change from 0 to
> 80. Can the "fdisk: Class not found" error showing up at the very end
> of the procedure of doing "fdisk -a -1 DISKNAME" be safely ignored?

Yes, I think so.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B5622D4.2070602>