Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 08:44:18 +0000 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>, Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: rand() is broken Message-ID: <200302030844.aa84195@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 02 Feb 2003 16:02:27 PST." <20030202160227.B62390@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > FWIW - AIX aggrees with Solaris. > Endiannes, or an SVR4 implementation difference? OS X agrees with FreeBSD i386. In fact, FreeBSD sparc64 and FreeBSD alpha are all the same too, so it seems the code isn't too sensitive to byteorder or wordsize. Bakul's comments on who agrees with BSD 4.{2,3,4}-* probably explain the differences. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi? <200302030844.aa84195>