Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 07:36:08 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> Cc: imp@village.org (Warner Losh), jkh@time.cdrom.com, ugen@latte.worldbank.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw vs ipfilter Message-ID: <7036.840432968@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Aug 1996 07:50:05 %2B1000." <199608182150.OAA14811@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>IP Filter has its own set of regression tests, which you can verify yourself >and then against a test run, if you like. Not to mention that this has >helped find bugs. Both rule parsing and rule processing are tested for >correctness. This is seen in neither ipfw or ipfwadm for FreeBSD/Linux. >In a security concious world, how can you not want to be sure of something >like this ? Uhm, aren't people overlooking the obvious here: We can have both, and the user can choose. That was my hope at least. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7036.840432968>