Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:56:14 -0700
From:      Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>
To:        George Rosamond <george@ceetonetechnology.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: TMPFS in kernels
Message-ID:  <1393818974.1149.270.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
In-Reply-To: <5313D0FE.8010008@ceetonetechnology.com>
References:  <5313D0FE.8010008@ceetonetechnology.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 19:46 -0500, George Rosamond wrote:
> Is there a reason why TMPFS(5) is not in the 10-Stable's ALIX and RPI-B
> kernels, yet in BEAGLEBONE?  Haven't checked the others.
> 
> Seems like a strong and mature replacement for md(4) from my
> experiences, and probably belongs in the Crochet fstabs.  I have been
> using on Alix, RPis, x86 for a long while, and never had any
> (noticeable) issues.
> 
> g

I agree.  Should we add it to all configs, or just to armv6 configs?

-- Ian






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1393818974.1149.270.camel>