Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:46:41 +0100
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG,  Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com>, Tim Kientzle <kientzle@FreeBSD.ORG>,  Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@FreeBSD.ORG>, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/unzip Makefile unzip.1 unzip.c
Message-ID:  <478BE651.1020901@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080114223239.GC56062@VARK.MIT.EDU>
References:  <200801080800.m08806jI012963@repoman.freebsd.org> <478A8FFE.8080602@freebsd.org> <478A95F2.1070709@FreeBSD.org> <478AA9E4.2010807@kientzle.com> <478ABC4B.8080601@FreeBSD.org> <20080114181154.GA2286@dragon.NUXI.org> <478BC55B.2060202@FreeBSD.org> <20080114223239.GC56062@VARK.MIT.EDU>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Schultz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> David O'Brien wrote:
>>
>>>> If we have to special case ports to deal with variant zipfiles that 
>>>> cannot be processed by /usr/bin/unzip then it gets messier because we 
>>>> have to account for some ports being satisfied with USE_ZIP=yes meaning 
>>>> /usr/bin/unzip and some still requiring /usr/ports/archivers/unzip.  I'd 
>>>> prefer not to have to add those workarounds.
>>> This seems quite easy...
>>>
>>> For those four-ish ports 's/USE_ZIP/USE_INFOZIP/'
>> That's what I meant by "special case".  I don't like adding special case 
>> variables to bsd.*.mk for the benefit of a tiny number of ports; that 
>> file is already cluttered enough.
> 
> Given how little time it took Tim to get libarchive from a simple
> prototype that supported tar files to a 23k line library that
> supports dozens of variant archive formats, I suspect that the
> limitation and the corresponding hack will be temporary. :) And if
> it is just a small number of ports, it could be set up as an
> extract dependency in the individual port makefiles, right?  It's
> not as though InfoZIP is going to change a lot in the near future.
> 
> 

No, you'd have to duplicate the do-extract code (or add a special 
variable for those 4 ports).  I'd much rather wait to see what Tim and 
Dag-Erling can come up with.

Kris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?478BE651.1020901>