Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:34:43 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: size of source tree Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404121034080.34556@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <20140412170902.135294e4@X220.alogt.com> References: <20140412115423.11092d84@X220.alogt.com> <5348F8AF.2080606@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20140412170902.135294e4@X220.alogt.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:26:23 +0100 > Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > >> On 12/04/2014 04:54, Erich Dollansky wrote: >>> The source tree dated 26.03.14 has a size of some 899GM while >>> today's source tree has some 1.8GB. >>> >>> Why is it suddenly so huge? >>> >> >> How were these source trees obtained? A checkout from SVN will have a >> .svn directory containing pristine copies of all of the files, which >> will pretty much double the space requirement. >> > both have been obtained with svn. The smaller one was started last year > with the then current version of svn. Have you run 'svn cleanup' on it?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1404121034080.34556>