Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 16:15:09 -0600 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: freeBSD@soulfound.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ls -la vs. ls -lah Message-ID: <20020318221509.GC13815@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <OFEILIIIFLHJBFKANOHCOEHBCAAA.freeBSD@soulfound.com> References: <OFEILIIIFLHJBFKANOHCOEHBCAAA.freeBSD@soulfound.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Mar 18), freeBSD@soulfound.com said: > I am new to the Free BSD way and found the human readable format I am > used to seeing on most Unix OS does not work on BSD. > > For example: > > > ls -lah > ls: illegal option -- h > usage: ls [-ABCFGHLPRTWabcdfgiklnoqrstu1] [file ...] > > > > Is there any command or plug-in I can use that will enable this or > use as an alternative? You can use the misc/gnuls port for now. Ls on -current has the '-h' option, so I assume it will be just a matter of time until 4.* gets it. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020318221509.GC13815>