Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 15:57:03 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Stephen J Bevan <stephen@etunnels.com> Cc: John Regehr <regehr@cs.utah.edu>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linuxthreads on Linux vs FreeBSD performance question Message-ID: <3CACE84F.D54C9248@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0204031311270.15454-100000@famine.cs.utah.edu> <3CAC036C.71DB41BB@mindspring.com> <15532.35908.341722.136026@apathy.etunnels.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stephen J Bevan wrote: > > The correct approach for CPU affinity is to run with per > > CPU scheduler queues. ... > > If "scheduler queue" means the same as "run queue" then > per CPU run queues were added to Linux in 2.5.2. See > http://lwn.net/2002/0110/a/scheduler.php3. I know this. The version we are discussing is 2.4.17, which is the version John Regehr is using for his paper. FreeBSD -current doesn't have a number of the deficiencies I note for FreeBSD, either, but he was using FreeBSD 4.5. The comparison was based on the version numbers he noted. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CACE84F.D54C9248>