Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Apr 2002 04:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: kern/37063: [PATCH] kernel does not support extended linux partitions
Message-ID:  <200204181100.g3IB0Eg57801@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/37063; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To: =?iso-8859-7?b?tuPj5evv8iDP6erv7e/s/PDv9evv8g==?= <lydwigvernon@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: kern/37063: [PATCH] kernel does not support extended linux
 partitions
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 20:51:22 +1000 (EST)

 On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, [iso-8859-7] =B6=E3=E3=E5=EB=EF=F2 =CF=E9=EA=EF=ED=EF=
 =EC=FC=F0=EF=F5=EB=EF=F2 wrote:
 
 > On Tuesday 16 April 2002 04:00, Bruce Evans wrote:
 > > I don't agree with changing the current behaviour.  Using extended Linu=
 x
 > > partitions mainly breaks inter-operability with other OS's, including
 > > previous versions of FreeBSD.
 >
 > But I'm not suggesting people to use 0x85 partitions. I' m merely suggest=
 ing
 > that the kernel should provide for people who, for whatever reason
 > (inertia?), are stuck with them. Some people call _this_ interoperability=
 =2E
 
 I'd concerned about breaking configurations that use 0x85 for something
 else.  Even if it is for a Linux extended partition, recognizing it will
 reorder the slice numbers for logical drives within ordinary extended
 partitions if the Linux one is scanned first.
 
 > BTW, to my knowledge, extended linux partitions were used (in place of 0x=
 05)
 > to prevent certain versions of dos fdisk from crashing when it tries to
 > follow beyond cyl 1024, that is, to preserve compatibility. (so for some
 > people, using 0x85 could be a neccessity)
 
 Perhaps this is not really a problem now.  I sometimes boot DOS-4.1 (1988
 version), and it is certainly confused by cylinders beyond 1024, but using
 magic extended partition types wouldn't help much because it is the primary
 partitions beyond cylinder 1024 that cause the biggest problems :-).
 
 Do you know which versions of Linux default to using 0x85?  The version
 of Linux fdisk that I have handy (built on Apr 23 1997) doesn't mention
 partition 0x85, but IIRC the Linux kernel support for partition 0x85 is
 older.
 
 Bruce
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200204181100.g3IB0Eg57801>