Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 10 Mar 2014 21:16:46 -0500
From:      Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To:        Adrian Gschwend <ml-ktk@netlabs.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Reoccuring ZFS performance problems
Message-ID:  <CA%2BtpaK2dZeyyCRNLK2p=Kp9XQ0WKxQMBg27tykj7BO2hJ53aFg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <531DF82F.3010607@netlabs.org>
References:  <531DF0DD.8070809@netlabs.org> <CA%2BtpaK1q8KRVB5HTMiu_Szy0XnbLMKzXKa4PC=USj05C4WFE7A@mail.gmail.com> <531DF82F.3010607@netlabs.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Adrian Gschwend <ml-ktk@netlabs.org>wrote:

> On 10.03.14 18:27, Adam Vande More wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> > Are you using a ZFS backed swap device?
>
> does not look like:
>
>        34  419430333  vtbd0  GPT  (200G)
>         34        128      1  freebsd-boot  (64k)
>        162    8388608      2  freebsd-swap  (4.0G)
>    8388770  411041597      3  freebsd-zfs  (196G)


The question remains unanswered.  swapinfo(8) will show the the swap device
in use, and you can use that information to determine if it is ZFS backed.
 There was a swap device listed in your earlier post, but not enough info
to determine what if it's the underlying block device.

-- 
Adam



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK2dZeyyCRNLK2p=Kp9XQ0WKxQMBg27tykj7BO2hJ53aFg>