Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:24:34 -0300 From: Alejandro Pulver <alepulver@FreeBSD.org> To: Atrox <silver.salonen@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bacula wx-console's wx version Message-ID: <20071025212434.44a885f8@deimos.mars.bsd> In-Reply-To: <13208310.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <13208310.post@talk.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/imen/rXy=LfrRl5DEh6F..9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Atrox <silver.salonen@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > Hi! >=20 > Does anyone see a reason why Bacula's wx-console should use WX 2.4? Every > time I start=20 > upgrading bacula-client, I just set "USE_WX=3D2.8" in bacula-server's Mak= efile=20 > and it builds and works perfectly. I've also tried compiling it with 2.6 = and=20 > there wasn't any problem with it neither. >=20 > So what do you think - is the 2.4 really necessary there or would the > WX-defaults suffice? >=20 If it works with wxWidgets 2.8, please test it with 2.6 and then you can set USE_WX to "2.4+", which will use 2.8 by default (at least 2.4/2.6 is installed but not 2.8). Then if all went fine submit a PR with the patch. Best Regards, Ale --Sig_/imen/rXy=LfrRl5DEh6F..9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHITPCiV05EpRcP2ERAjulAJ9wSJNi5bPYQ0vxOwip1+f9Pd+GmQCgocF9 ccoYsYozKAdjvFqAQKIwA3o= =mNY+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/imen/rXy=LfrRl5DEh6F..9--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071025212434.44a885f8>