Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:30:00 +0100 From: John <tech-lists@zyxst.net> To: Greg Byshenk <freebsd@byshenk.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KBI unexpexted change in stable/11 ? Message-ID: <1522251000.3459457.1319064600.0294FF59@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <20180328142014.GO51114@v1.leiden.byshenk.net> References: <20180328130903.GC6612@zxy.spb.ru> <20180328133946.GN51114@v1.leiden.byshenk.net> <f716732b-cadf-3dc8-3df3-e40b96564efe@zyxst.net> <20180328142014.GO51114@v1.leiden.byshenk.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, at 15:20, Greg Byshenk wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 03:11:50PM +0100, tech-lists wrote: > > On 28/03/2018 14:39, Gregory Byshenk wrote: > > > You can do this manually, or by adding a PORTS_MODULES line to > > > /etc/make.conf. This will rebuild the listed modules from ports > > > when you build a new kernel. > > > > Are you sure it's in /etc/make.conf and not /etc/src.conf? > > No. But it is in the man page for make.conf and not src.conf. yeah. That is... confusing! at least to me, because [I thought it would be] src.conf that's consulted when src is built. So I ran a couple of tests and found that it would work in either file HOWEVER if one ports module statement was in src.conf and another, different ports module statement was in make.conf, that the one in src.conf would get built but the one in make.conf would not. how confusing is that. This is on 11.1-stable. -- John tech-lists@zyxst.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1522251000.3459457.1319064600.0294FF59>