Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:09:36 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/sleep sleep.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0211151308000.47412-100000@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20021115202751.GJ50692@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> [021115 12:17] wrote: > > :Will the knobs allow one to link /bin and /sbin against full blown > > :libc? That would be nice as we can then start using pam and user > > :management in / with dynamic modules (finally!). > > : > > :-- > > :-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] > > > > I think that should be a goal. I think something like this: > > > > USE_MINIC=YES Link against the mini-C library. > > > > USE_SHARED_BIN=YES Link against a shared libc or mini-C rather > > then linking statically. > > Moiving forward I think it makes the most sense for us to maker /s?bin > dynamically linked against libc by default with options for linking > statically or dynamically against libc or mini-libc via make.conf. I appreciate your interest but want to avoid a war so we'll just say that the _option_ to link them dynamically will be added but the default will be left up to a separate discussion, once things are well-tested in both configurations. -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0211151308000.47412-100000>