Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 02:36:41 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LFS is nuked? Message-ID: <19980131023641.18792@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from Garrett Wollman on Fri, Jan 30, 1998 at 08:08:32PM -0500 References: <19980130234945.43035@klemm.gtn.com> <199801310004.RAA13451@usr05.primenet.com> <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 30, 1998 at 08:08:32PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Sat, 31 Jan 1998 00:04:04 +0000 (GMT), Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> said: > > > Of course, we all know that once something is in the attic, it's > > bound to be studiosly attended to, just like the XNS, ISO, and > > X.25 code have all been fixed... > > But unlike XNS, ISO-CLNS, and X.25, LFS might actually be of value to > real users. Hey! I'm probably going to have to either revive X.25 or drop a project, as TCP/IP over the ISDN D-channel is supposedly implemented encapsulated in X.25. This isn't an active project right now, but it is on my official TODO-list at work. If X.25 networking had been functional in FreeBSD, it would've been higher on the list. Eivind, not a "real user" ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980131023641.18792>