Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 22:32:56 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Chris Costello <chris@FreeBSD.ORG>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenPAM Message-ID: <3C773798.85318848@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0202221507430.74100-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote: > > I'll let DES answer that one... though have you looked at the > > Linux-PAM code? > > It was derived from Mr Tso's PAM code (unveiled at USENIX > a few years ago.) He was adamant it was Dual Licensed. > (at that time at least). I meant, have you made a qualitative comparison of the two code bases? That's what DES asked you to do, in the post you were replying to, when he asked for complaints. If you think this is not an improvement, or isn't simply change for the sake of change, then you should speak up, after you have looked at the code that's there, and the proposed replacement. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C773798.85318848>