Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 21:14:28 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 215621] editors/openoffice-4: mild attempt to make the build reproducible Message-ID: <bug-215621-25061-51ZlRcsUfu@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-215621-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-215621-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pedro F. Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org> has reassigned Bugzilla Automation <bugzilla@FreeBSD.org>'s request for maintainer-feedback to office@FreeBSD.= org: Bug 215621: editors/openoffice-4: mild attempt to make the build reproducib= le https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D215621 --- Description --- Created attachment 178337 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D178337&action= =3Dedit patch to improve reproducibility No claims about reproducibility yet but I found two cases where AOO embeds the date in the executables. - Include a patch from upstream that removes some embedded __DATE__/__TIME__ stamps. - Use the portname and revision for --with-build-version to avoid embedding= the build date in the "About" dialog, as is done by default. For the record, I tried to use ${PKGNAME} instead of ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERS= ION} but that would break the build.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-215621-25061-51ZlRcsUfu>