Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:55:25 -0400 From: Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, QAT@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, gahr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/q Makefile Message-ID: <20090413165524.GE48814@atarininja.org> In-Reply-To: <20090413193822.23a64432@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <200904130953.n3D9rSjT038689@repoman.freebsd.org> <20090413110842.D60498FC3B@release.ixsystems.com> <20090413124252.GB48814@atarininja.org> <20090413164306.54d5af3a@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20090413140429.GD48814@atarininja.org> <20090413193822.23a64432@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 07:38:22PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:04:29 -0400 > Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 04:43:06PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:42:52 -0400 > > > Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 04:08:42AM -0700, QAT@FreeBSD.org wrote: > > > > > The Restless Daemon identified a PLIST error while trying to > > > > > build: q-7.11 maintained by gahr@FreeBSD.org > > > > > Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: ports/lang/q/Makefile,v 1.35 > > > > > 2009/04/13 09:53:27 gahr Exp $ > > > > > > > > > > Excerpt from > > > > > http://QAT.TecNik93.com/logs/7-STABLE-FPT-NPD/q-7.11.log : > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > This looks like a false positive to me. > > > > > > It wasn't. There was a second commit that fixed the problem probably > > > while the port was building. > > > > Ah, and by the time I got to see the log it was fixed. Thanks. > > Yup. > > > > > On a related note, how does QAT handle MAKE_JOBS_SAFE? Does it > > > > manage to find the error which could have been much earlier in > > > > the log? > > > > > > QAT has 4 CPUs so it builds with multiple make jobs if the ports > > > says so. There's no supplementary analyses being done, if the build > > > doesn't exit when one of the jobs fails (as it should), the error > > > would be catch at install or packaging time. > > > > But then the log excerpt in the email may not actually contain the > > error. > > The excerpt is just a tail on the last lines of the log; usually it > catches the error; I could try to do a little heuristics, but I'm not > that sure of the results (I'd use the markup patters used by webui). OK, that's what I thought. I'm not suggesting that be done, but just that it's a known thing (I hesitate to even call it a problem). > Anyway, the log snippet is intended to hint the problem and any > responsible commit implies reviewing the hole log. Absolutely. -- WXS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090413165524.GE48814>