Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:21:37 -0000
From:      "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
To:        "Sean Chittenden" <sean@gigave.com>, "OxY" <oxy@field.hu>
Cc:        freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: em0 and tunnel performance problem
Message-ID:  <005901c60bf4$b3cf2260$0100a8c0@multiplay.co.uk>
References:  <000901c60b87$e40b8ad0$0201a8c0@oxy><000401c60bab$9fd494a0$0201a8c0@oxy> <20051228210915.GY28159@mailhost.gigave.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sean Chittenden" <sean@gigave.com>

> You can *never* rely on, or use auto negotiation.  Its very common to
> have the switch be set to auto, the PC to be set to 100 FDX, and have
> the switch settle on 100 half-duplex (Cisco switches in particular).
> netstat -i will probably show you that you have line errors on your
> em0 interface.  If you're running on Cisco switches, see the
> following:

In fact is also common to get errors when both are hardcoded the
only resolution being to set both to auto it all depends on the hardware.

    Steve


================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. 

In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137
or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?005901c60bf4$b3cf2260$0100a8c0>