Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 01 Mar 2013 17:51:36 -0500
From:      Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com>
To:        Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
Cc:        FreeBSD questions <questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Limiting jail CPU & memory resources
Message-ID:  <513130F8.4010308@a1poweruser.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.ws9zbize34t2sn@tech304.office.supranet.net>
References:  <5130BD4D.5000305@a1poweruser.com> <op.ws9u1l1z34t2sn@tech304.office.supranet.net> <5130CEC9.30005@a1poweruser.com> <op.ws9zbize34t2sn@tech304.office.supranet.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Felder wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:52:41 -0600, <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> wrote:
> 
>> Read that all ready and left me with more question than answers.
>> Its experimental and has to be compiled into the kernel.
>> Need solutions that are provided as part of the base system.
>> Such as a loadable kernel module.
>>  Can not be risking the security of production jails on some
>> experimental software.
> 
> Unfortunately there's nothing else available yet. You'd be better off 
> using full-fledged hypervisors like Xen, KVM, or ESXi. I'm also 
> anxiously awaiting some improvement in this area.
> 
> 

What do you think about the new jail.conf parameter cpuset.id from jail(8)?

Seems to me it's a way to dedicate one or more CPUs to a single jail for 
increased jail performance. Really the opposite of limiting cpu 
resources to a jail.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?513130F8.4010308>