Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:13:20 +0100
From:      Nenad Mihajlovic <nenad@venturis.hu>
To:        Derek Ragona <derek@computinginnovations.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD SAMBA file server performance - strange behaviour
Message-ID:  <20080226101320.94m6g1udc000koc0@venturis.hu>
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080225101927.024c0d88@mail.computinginnovations.com>
References:  <20080225163839.0ynsnyqygwgs84cg@venturis.hu> <6.0.0.22.2.20080225101927.024c0d88@mail.computinginnovations.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I found it.

I'll try it out, and see what we get.
Interesting thing is, that i went again to verify the finds that i =20
wrote in my letter, and it is not the ping itself that increases =20
performance, but the fact of multiple connections - while pinging from =20
console (ping -f), the behaviour stays the same, 5-13 Mb/sec varying, =20
when i log in through ssh and do the ping -f , it seems to me that the =20
fact of the second _active_ connection actually improves the things.

Nenad


<SNIP>
...
>> On the other hand, i experienced that when i try PING on the File
>> server's IP address from the fileserver, i get performance increase in
>> the transfer speed - the bigger the traffic i generate, the better the
>> results, which max out at 25-27 MB/sec with flood ping.
>>
>> Has anyone else experienced any similar behaviour?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Nenad
>
> Just as an FYI, you may find it better to use FreeNAS, which is based
> on FreeBSD.
>
> http://www.freenas.org/
>
>
>         -Derek
>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o=
rg"
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus  =20
>> signature database 2900 (20080225) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>
> --=20
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.


----- End message from derek@computinginnovations.com -----





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080226101320.94m6g1udc000koc0>