Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 06:58:28 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org> To: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: harder and harder to avoid pkg Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1610150654480.853@aneurin.horsfall.org> In-Reply-To: <CAO%2BPfDdhBeSY=Ti_Jv4x8dbH_g2JHRm39skTTeT3qGYHCJrquA@mail.gmail.com> References: <638fe078-80db-2492-90be-f1280eb8d445@freebsd.org> <20161012092403.66a41d9e@freedom.alkumuna.eu> <00f3768e-f57a-661c-aa62-89cdf10926bd@netfence.it> <CAO%2BPfDfLtw6OjPvrMC5hzfEL1CH7wyLZ0=RQstqZrRmOmk5pxA@mail.gmail.com> <57FFB185.6030601@quip.cz> <1476425664.4864.2.camel@unix-experience.fr> <CAO%2BPfDdhBeSY=Ti_Jv4x8dbH_g2JHRm39skTTeT3qGYHCJrquA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, David Demelier wrote: > It's not writing a port that is complicated, it's the whole > infrastructure. You should see the Macports infrastructure... Fairly easy for the end user, but those developers sweat blood to make it so. -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.11.1610150654480.853>