Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:44:38 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> Cc: Robert Withrow <bwithrow@nortelnetworks.com>, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, glenngombert@zdnetonebox.com Subject: Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Message-ID: <XFMail.20010919094438.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20010918163352.F90244@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18-Sep-2001 Alexander Langer wrote: > > The previous suggestion (have a generic XFree86 port) is a) hacky, but b) > > workable in the current package framework I suspect.. > > Yes, would be a nice workaround. > > I don't use packages, though :) I'm forced not to if I'm using a machine which needs X4.. Usually for a fresh install I use packages since it gets a working machine quicker :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20010919094438.doconnor>