Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 00:33:11 -0600 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> Cc: Yar Tikhiy <yar@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, Jeff Roberson <jeff@freebsd.org>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove NTFS kernel support Message-ID: <20080207063311.GA6118@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com> References: <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:00:41AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: > - Do you know a good reason to not use FUSE ntfs implementation? We just had a PR come in that claims the ports FUSE NTFS implementation isn't working: 120286 alepulve ports open serious medium current-us sysutils/fusefs-ntfs makes fatal trap/page fault in FreeBSD-7.0 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=120286&cat= mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080207063311.GA6118>