Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 18:26:38 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: pst@shockwave.com Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/netperf - Imported sources Message-ID: <199608010126.SAA22468@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199608010118.SAA09572@precipice.shockwave.com> (message from Paul Traina on Wed, 31 Jul 1996 18:18:19 -0700)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Hummm... it's testing resources outside the local computer, so I think * benchmarks would be more confusing, albiet not totally inappropriate. * * *I* would never think to look for it there. I guess that's why you put it in net. ;) Anyway, tcpblast is in benchmarks, so leaving this in net will make us inconsistent. It shouldn't matter whether it's testing the local computer or not. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608010126.SAA22468>