Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:26:23 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233360] [new port] security/otp OTP tool Message-ID: <bug-233360-7788-m8HU1FBxFJ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-233360-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-233360-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233360 --- Comment #7 from J.R. Oldroyd <fbsd@opal.com> --- Several other ports that obtain their source from an svn server overload do-fetch to create the tarball. I copied the example from those. Something like 19 of them do it this way! The Porter's Handbook documents flavors and gives a specific example (sec 7= .2) of using "x11 nox11" as the way to add/exclude X11 functionality. I copied that example. What is the point of an example in the handbook that is then rejected when we use it???! I will make the change to the .desktop file. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-233360-7788-m8HU1FBxFJ>