Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:34:56 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, yar@comp.chem.msu.su, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, des@des.no Subject: Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING src/include fts.h src/lib/libc/gen Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c src/sys/sys param.h Message-ID: <20080128163456.4bc7d413.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080128194008.GA55830@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <20080127043334.GA75235@dragon.NUXI.org> <20080127053813.GH49535@comp.chem.msu.su> <20080127094653.GA74753@dragon.NUXI.org> <20080128053514.GK49535@comp.chem.msu.su> <86odb6usm6.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080128161300.GP49535@comp.chem.msu.su> <86prvluc33.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080128170128.GS49535@comp.chem.msu.su> <20080128182827.GA53020@toxic.magnesium.net> <20080128190705.GU49535@comp.chem.msu.su> <20080128194008.GA55830@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:40:09 -1000 Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > * Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> [ 2008-01-28 ] > [ Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING src/include fts.h src/lib/libc/gen Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c src/sys/sys param.h ] > > But, hey, have you seen the diffs in the first place? You seem to > > assume that my commit was only to kill the innocent int64_t. > > Yes, actually. I found some of the decisions strange, the work overall > worthwhile and the "long long" change particularly gauche. Several others have > said things that I thought at the time, and I was following the discussion > closely. (Your bogus standards reasoning was, in particular, a red flag, and I > suspect that that caught some people off-guard since your reasoning is > fallacious and that you would have gotten less grief for the change if you had > given less strange justifications (even no justifications) initially.) You said > that you had received no back-out request, so I made one. Instead of > acknowledging that you had now received a single backout request which you would > not honor (and I was only referring to the "long long" bit, for clarity), you > chose to grouch that I was rehashing old points (I do not believe backout > requests should come without reasoning attached.) I'm not sure I completely agree with a backout but I agree with changing the types in a follow up commit. -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080128163456.4bc7d413.trhodes>