Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:27:10 GMT
From:      Olivier Houchard <cognet@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject:   PERFORCE change 110695 for review
Message-ID:  <200611292227.kATMRA4m027481@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=110695

Change 110695 by cognet@cognet on 2006/11/29 22:26:47

	Just return (0) for now in elf_cpu_load_file() and
	elf_cpu_unload_file().
	We may have to flush/invalidate the caches here, but it will only
	matters when we'll want to have kernel modules, and doing this should
	give us symbols in DDB.

Affected files ...

.. //depot/projects/mips2/src/sys/mips/mips/elf_machdep.c#4 edit

Differences ...

==== //depot/projects/mips2/src/sys/mips/mips/elf_machdep.c#4 (text+ko) ====

@@ -112,15 +112,16 @@
 int
 elf_cpu_load_file(linker_file_t fil)
 {
-	printf("%s unimplemented at %s:%d, returning error.\n", __func__, __FILE__, __LINE__);
-	return (ENXIO);
+
+	/* XXX: We may have to flush/invalidate the caches and the TLB here */
+	return (0);
 }
 
 int
 elf_cpu_unload_file(linker_file_t fil)
 {
-	printf("%s unimplemented at %s:%d, returning error.\n", __func__, __FILE__, __LINE__);
-	return (ENXIO);
+
+	return (0);
 }
 
 int



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200611292227.kATMRA4m027481>