Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:00:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Jon Passki <cykyc@yahoo.com> To: Lewis Thompson <purple@lewiz.net>, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pam_krb5 port question Message-ID: <20030909150054.30398.qmail@web40708.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030909004121.GA782@lewiz.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- Lewis Thompson <purple@lewiz.net> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:07:17AM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk > wrote: > > Jon Passki wrote: > > >Is there any reason why the port is mainly focused for MIT > Kerberos > > >and not Heimdal? > > > > KRB5_IMPL=heimdail didn't help? If so, it'll be great if you > fix this > > and send a patch to the port maintainer. > > I'm personally not skilled enough to do it (well, not skilled... > I just > wouldn't know how) but I'd really like to see this use the > Heimdal > Kerberos provided in the base system. My understanding is that the base systems builds pam_krb5 on -STABLE. Take a look at /usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_krb5/* If MAKE_KERBEROS5 is set, the pam module should be built and installed. This port isn't necessary for the base system. It would only be necessary for the Heimdal or MIT ports. Take care, Jon __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030909150054.30398.qmail>