Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 02:17:57 -0700 From: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> To: Chris Howells <lists@chrishowells.co.uk>, security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:08.realpath Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.1.20030804021401.02bce1f0@popserver.sfu.ca> In-Reply-To: <200308041010.52904.lists@chrishowells.co.uk> References: <5.0.2.1.1.20030804004417.02bcc920@popserver.sfu.ca> <5.0.2.1.1.20030804004417.02bcc920@popserver.sfu.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:10 04/08/2003 +0100, Chris Howells wrote: >On Monday 04 August 2003 08:54, Colin Percival wrote: > > Affected applications which were statically linked to the vulnerable > > code would still need to be recompiled. > >I'm just trying to work out which applications on my system are statically >linked or not. I'm sure someone else can offer better s >su-2.05b# ldd `which nfsd` >ldd: /sbin/nfsd: not a dynamic executable > >I running a server with stuff like nfs, samba, dhcpd, bind etc, and I'll CVSup >and rebuild the bast system and kernel, but so far I've only been using >binary packages... need to start using ports some time I suppose.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.0.2.1.1.20030804021401.02bce1f0>