Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      17 Mar 97 15:12:06 -0600
From:      "Richard Wackerbarth" <rkw@dataplex.net>
To:        "Nate Williams" <nate@mt.sri.com>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: -current and -stable mailing lists 
Message-ID:  <AF530FC9-14772E8@204.69.236.50>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 17, 1997 2:41 PM, Nate Williams <mailto:nate@mt.sri.com> wrote:

>> 	b) Assuming that the answer to (a) is no and now you've got
>> 	   carte blanche to change things, what names would you choose
>> 	   to describe the 3 tracks of development (mostly quiescent,
>> 	   current release track, bleeding edge development) which you
>> 	   feel would most adequately convey their purpose to the
>> 	   layperson?  Explain your rationale for each choice.
>
>-stable (Released versions of FreeBSD, since any release has some
>         measure of stability)
>-release (The 'next' release of FreeBSD)
>-devel (What was once -current, now renamed to devel which reflect the
>        code on the 'HEAD' branch).
>
Perhaps "next" is a good label. In fact, why not use that name for an
entire OS?

:-)


>There might be some confusion on when to use -stable vs. -release, but
>most questions would be appropriate for either, since most people run
>the most recent release, so the question would be answered 'fixed in
>-release'.
>
>The big issue in my mind is how to differentiate 'released' vs. 'release
>in progress'.

There is always some ambiguity with any set of labels about status.
"Test(ing)"  or "Trial" might be used to designate the "reasonably complete
but still pre-release" state (some use "alpha", "beta", etc to designate
how
far along the process the item has progressed.We don't want anything to
that
fine granularity)
In any case, we have a certain ambiguity between 2.2.0-RELEASED and
2.2.1-INPROGRESS. Assuming that the head branch is no longer available for
2.2 improvement, there is still the problem that 2.2-TODAY may be either
better or worse than 2.2.0-RELEASE. If some major bug had been fixed, it
would likely be better ---
unless someone just committed some untested code :-(





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AF530FC9-14772E8>