Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:07:15 -0700 From: "Southo" <keith@southo.net> To: "'Mike Tancsa'" <mike@sentex.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: [full build as of Sept. 24] "No route to host" after certain time... Message-ID: <037b01c382b5$ec4b86d0$fd01a8c0@southoq6ppwrt1> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20030924114051.06fb5e58@209.112.4.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Mike Tancsa
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:42 AM
To: Pawel Malachowski
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [full build as of Sept. 24] "No route to host" after =
certain
time...
Hi, can you clarify that
>My rc.local script is something like:
>LAN0=3Dfxp0
>IP=3D192.168.x.y
>ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${IP}/24
>route add default 192.168.x.1
>ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${A}/28
>ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${B}/32
>ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${C}/32
>ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${D}/32
># A, B, C, D are from the same /28 and everything worked perfectly in =
the
past
are all out of the original /24 on LAN0 ?
---Mike
At 11:34 AM 24/09/2003, Pawel Malachowski wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:16:07AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> > What if you alias those IP address to lo0 ? Does it correct the =
problem
?
>
>I've moved all /32 addresses from fxp0 to lo0, it doesn't fix the =
problem.
>After first reboot route table was complete, however after second =
reboot
>default route and one local route were not present.
>
>
>--
>Pawe=B3 Ma=B3achowski
4.9-PRERELEASE Wed Sep 24 01:28:50 PDT 2003=20
I had the same thing on two systems built yesterday. All machines on the
same subnet could connect to it just no remote connectivity. Lost the
default route somehow.
4.9-PRERELEASE Wed Sep 24 01:28:50 PDT 2003
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?037b01c382b5$ec4b86d0$fd01a8c0>