Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 14:58:24 -0500 From: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> To: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> Cc: Demelier David <demelier.david@gmail.com>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: graphics/dri fails to build. Message-ID: <1272830304.2613.17.camel@balrog.2hip.net> In-Reply-To: <28390E7D-8ED1-42F0-9476-537A9128D3E5@gmail.com> References: <20100502090442.GA2548@Abricot.malikania.fr> <20100502092610.GA50721@Abricot.malikania.fr> <1272803451.2452.17.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <28390E7D-8ED1-42F0-9476-537A9128D3E5@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 11:46 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On May 2, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 11:26 +0200, Demelier David wrote: > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=143723 > >> > >> It seems adding CFLAGS+=-march-=native solved the problem but I > >> don't want to > >> keep this flag everytime in my make.conf > >> > >> How this flag could solve the problem ? I can't understand. > > > > This actually stems from libdrm. Intel requires certain atomics that > > are not available on pure i386. They are present in code built for > > i486 > > +. The default cpu was changed to i486 some time . > > Should the port be marked broken with -march=i386 then? Well, I'm not sure quite how we would do that... but if your kernel/world is not really old, it should just work unless you force gcc to produce code that will run on i386. robert. > -Garrett -- Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1272830304.2613.17.camel>