Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 21:02:52 +0200 From: Remko Lodder <remko@FreeBSD.org> To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/docproj todo.sgml Message-ID: <4479F3DC.8090101@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20060528150032.46db20b0.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> References: <200605281300.k4SD00HO033065@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060528142347.GA79291@abigail.blackend.org> <4479B395.8040603@FreeBSD.org> <20060528170520.GB79291@abigail.blackend.org> <20060528150032.46db20b0.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom Rhodes wrote: > On Sun, 28 May 2006 19:05:20 +0200 > Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >> On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 04:28:37PM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote: >>> Marc Fonvieille wrote: >>>> On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 01:00:00PM +0000, Remko Lodder wrote: >>>>> remko 2006-05-28 13:00:00 UTC >>>>> >>>>> FreeBSD doc repository >>>>> >>>>> Modified files: >>>>> en/docproj todo.sgml >>>>> Log: >>>>> Add a TODO item for updating the -entire- handbook from 4.X to 5.X and >>>>> later, while leaving the 4.X information on the background. >>>> I may be wrong but it seems this doesn't help and collides with other >>>> next items in the list. If some parts need an update they must be >>>> clearly mentioned, this would help to know where some changes are >>>> needed. 4.X support should be dropped and not reorganized; since >>>> 4.11-RELEASE Handbook is available at http://docs.freebsd.org/doc/ there >>>> is no need, most of time, to talk about 4.X. >>>> >>>> Marc >>> So you are waving the flag: Kill the 4.X specific stuff? Since that >>> would make my life much easier as the only remaining translator >>> for the NL project... >> The first lines of the Handbook say: >> "This handbook covers the installation and day to day use of FreeBSD >> 5.5-RELEASE and FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE." We should not worry about 4.X >> when it does not bring anything interesting; "old things" must be >> updated when they still exist in 5.X, etc. > > If everyone is cool with it, I'd love to see all the "Note in > 4.X do this" comments nuked. :) > Yes that is what I prefer as well :-), so if enough people think that is the right thing to do, please tell me and i will start removing all the specific 4.x items / sections, unless they require addition for 5.X ofcourse (which would then make an really easy way to know what items should be on the TODO list). cheers, remko -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder ** remko@elvandar.org FreeBSD ** remko@FreeBSD.org /* Quis custodiet ipsos custodes */
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4479F3DC.8090101>