Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 19:44:18 +0100 From: Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk> To: Michael Elbel <Michael.Elbel@consol.de> Cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Security Ceritfication for individuals Message-ID: <19990610194418.A41777@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> In-Reply-To: <19990607080257.B42584@consol.de>; from Michael Elbel on Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 08:02:59AM %2B0200 References: <19990605224422.A70789@consol.de> <3759FCC2.D2666FFE@softweyr.com> <19990607080257.B42584@consol.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 08:02:59AM +0200, Michael Elbel wrote:
> I think it would not be too much work replacing the low number of questions
> that are more Solaris/SYSV than BSD.
Looks like someone's already done the work for Linux. From an e-mail
they just sent me;
> Windows 98 Administrator
> Linux Administrator
> Written English
>
> Coming very soon:
>
> Programmer/Analyst Aptitude Indicator
>
> If you have any questions/concerns, please contact us at
> mailto:support@tekmetrics.com
So, who wants to tackle this then?
N
--
[intentional self-reference] can be easily accommodated using a blessed,
non-self-referential dummy head-node whose own object destructor severs
the links.
-- Tom Christiansen in <375143b5@cs.colorado.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990610194418.A41777>