Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Dec 2009 13:08:46 -0800
From:      "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
Cc:        "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>, Tarick <tungan@ukr.net>
Subject:   RE: panic in AcpiExReleaseMutex
Message-ID:  <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308583E8F2BC7@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com>
References:  <4B178387.4050601@icyb.net.ua> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308583E8F26CF@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> <4B189CD6.30906@icyb.net.ua> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308583E8F2A1F@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> <4B1975EE.5070803@icyb.net.ua> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Now, we have a code in EcSpaceHandler that makes a
>direct call to EcGpeQueryHandler during a cold boot phase if SCI bit is se=
t
>in
>CSR register.  EcGpeQueryHandler performs an EC query and executes _Qxx
>method if need.

OK, I see. No GPE, but a direct call to the handler, which makes a query an=
d invokes _Q20 or _Q09

What is the thread_id, and does it ever change for this thread?


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Moore, Robert
>Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 1:00 PM
>To: 'Andriy Gapon'
>Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org; Tarick
>Subject: RE: panic in AcpiExReleaseMutex
>
>It would appear that a GPE is taken, for the EC device, thus invoking
>EcGpeQueryHandler. In what context is _Q20 or _Q09 executed?
>
>This might be an important question: What is the thread_id of this initial
>thread?
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Andriy Gapon [mailto:avg@icyb.net.ua]
>>Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 12:50 PM
>>To: Moore, Robert
>>Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org; Tarick
>>Subject: Re: panic in AcpiExReleaseMutex
>>
>>on 04/12/2009 20:45 Moore, Robert said the following:
>>> Yes, you are correct. I did not have the code in front of me at the
>time.
>>>
>>> When AcpiExReleaseMutex is called, apparently the mutex is in fact held=
,
>>> otherwise the function would have aborted immediately.
>>>
>>> When the mutex is held, the Thread->AcquiredMutexList is expected to
>hold
>>(at
>>> the minimum) the mutex object being released. Something is very wrong i=
f
>>this
>>> list is NULL when releasing the mutex.
>>>
>>> Just to make sure: All of this is happening in the same thread?
>>
>>Yes, this happens when there is only the initial thread running on BSP, n=
o
>>other
>>threads are started yet.
>>
>>
>>--
>>Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308583E8F2BC7>