Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 16:31:27 +0700 From: "Vadim Goncharov" <vadimnuclight@tpu.ru> To: "Luigi Rizzo" <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] ipfw packet tagging Message-ID: <ops9hgqpmr4fjv08@nuclight.avtf.net> In-Reply-To: <20060512085631.A19484@xorpc.icir.org> References: <ops9fwnzbw17d6mn@nuclight.avtf.net> <44648E66.6010800@freebsdbrasil.com.br> <20060512065327.B16302@xorpc.icir.org> <ops9f3lwis4fjv08@nuclight.avtf.net> <20060512085631.A19484@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
12.05.06 22:56 Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> A question about features: is it worth adding functionality of matching >> range of tags? For example: >> >> ipfw add pass ip from any to any tagged 1-5,10,20 > > i think it is a useful feature, and if you reuse the existing code > for matching port ranges etc to implement it, performance should > be reasonably good. OK, Andrey made new version of patches available: http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/kernel/ipfw_tags/ Manpage patch is integrated as well as new untag/tagged range functionality, based on existing port ranges matching code. Short test shown that it works. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ops9hgqpmr4fjv08>