Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:56:04 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/misc Makefile ports/misc/instant-tinderbox Makefile pkg-descr Message-ID: <20051128075604.GM1239@k7.mavetju> In-Reply-To: <20051128061137.GA11774@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200511280557.jAS5va2I051976@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051128061137.GA11774@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:11:37AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I think this port is a bad idea. It'll take a fairly long time to > build on pointyhat from all the pkg_adds (and it will be right at the > end of the package builds since it depends on everything else, so the > whole build will end up waiting for it), and it's not useful for > anyone apart from users of marcus' tinderbox scripts. Therefore it > should be reimplemented there instead. If I add a .ifdef to it which prevents it from being attempted to build on non-tinderbox systems, is that a good solution? Or does the packaging system ignore IGNOREs? Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051128075604.GM1239>