Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:29:04 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade++ Message-ID: <20030422202904.GY18848@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20030422173225.GF64086@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030422171303.GW18848@elvis.mu.org> <20030422173225.GF64086@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> [030422 10:32] wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 10:13:03AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > Just wanted to say thanks for one of the coolest programs ever. I > > just wish there was a way to get it to skip (use the default) the > > configuration screen for samba and ghostscript and whatnot. > > bsd.port.mk tests the BATCH variable to skip interactive ports. See > the comments in that file. Wouldn't it make sense for it to set that when run with -a? Unless some other "do interactive" flag was set? It would be cool if there was a way for ports to remeber/inherit previous configs done when installed or upgraded and just use those. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030422202904.GY18848>