Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 16:30:36 -0800 (PST) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, rkw@dataplex.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Version Resolution? Message-ID: <199711200030.QAA01153@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971119141950.3249B-100000@andrsn.stanford.edu> (message from Annelise Anderson on Wed, 19 Nov 1997 14:23:01 -0800 (PST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* It *should* come with the sources, as I said, so that the date is valid * no matter when the "make world" is done or when the kernel is built. Yes. Besides, the kernel build date is already part of "uname -a". * This seems to be the hard part. Well, how about just adding RELDATE for now (while you guys work on the "automated" solution, that is)? At least if that value is updated often enough, we will be able to distinguish between versions with "major" differences (some library added, "top" added, before or after 3.0-release, etc...). Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711200030.QAA01153>