Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 23:19:35 GMT From: Sam Leffler <sam@FreeBSD.org> To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: PERFORCE change 141939 for review Message-ID: <200805202319.m4KNJZ6E089846@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=141939 Change 141939 by sam@sam_ebb on 2008/05/20 23:19:16 correct comment Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/vap/sys/net80211/ieee80211_proto.c#32 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/vap/sys/net80211/ieee80211_proto.c#32 (text+ko) ==== @@ -1331,12 +1331,14 @@ if (ic->ic_flags & IEEE80211_F_SCAN) { /* - * If scanning just ignore and reset state. It's awkward - * to reset the swbmiss timer on scan start/end so instead - * we do this. If get a bmiss after coming out of scan - * because we haven't had time to receive a beacon then - * we should probe the AP before posting a real bmiss - * (unless iv_bmiss_max has been artifiically lowered). + * If scanning just ignore and reset state. If we get a + * bmiss after coming out of scan because we haven't had + * time to receive a beacon then we should probe the AP + * before posting a real bmiss (unless iv_bmiss_max has + * been artifiically lowered). A cleaner solution might + * be to disable the timer on scan start/end but to handle + * case of multiple sta vap's we'd need to disable the + * timers of all affected vap's. */ vap->iv_swbmiss_count = 0; } else if (vap->iv_swbmiss_count == 0) {
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200805202319.m4KNJZ6E089846>