Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 20:59:34 +0300 From: Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, obrien@NUXI.com, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: *HEADS UP* Correction to previous postings. Message-ID: <199803141759.UAA01819@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 14 Mar 1998 19:25:37 %2B0300." <199803141625.TAA01024@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dmitrij Tejblum wrote: > Mike Smith wrote: > > You never had a choice, other than due to bogsity in the kernel. All > > that's happened is that the illusion of choice has been removed. It's > > no longer mandatory (or supported) to abuse the compatability slice > > when mounting the root filesystem. > > But now I still can mount /usr both as wd1s1f and as wd1f. Root is the > only filesystem that I must mount as wd1s1a (and cannot as wd1a). So, > previous behavior was, probably, more consistent (from user's point of > view). > Oops, apparently, this is not all true. Apparently, root is always was only filesystem (here) that accepted only one way of mounting, and now, with new mount, I have two way for mounting root (though one of them cause the warning). So, new behavior is more consistent. Sorry. Dima To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803141759.UAA01819>