Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      7 Apr 2003 13:35:59 +0200
From:      "clemens fischer" <ino-qc@spotteswoode.de.eu.org>
To:        "Frans =?iso-8859-15?q?Gidl=F6f?=" <neko@skebo.ac>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Prioritizing empty TCP ACKs
Message-ID:  <adf2mteo.fsf@ID-23066.news.dfncis.de>
In-Reply-To: <E06E4F19-6843-11D7-8C1F-00039351C496@skebo.ac> (Frans =?iso-8859-15?q?Gidl=F6f's?= message of "Sun, 6 Apr 2003 17:24:36 +0200")
References:  <E06E4F19-6843-11D7-8C1F-00039351C496@skebo.ac>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Frans Gidlöf <neko@skebo.ac>:

> So how do you catch one of those tcp-ack-no-payload packets with
> IPFW?.

AFAIK ipfw doesn't (yet?) have that iplen thing, but ipfw2 has it, or
will have it.  you might experiment with `tcpoptions ...' and
`established', though.  i don't want to do that, but am still
interested if these less powerful measures make a difference, so keep
us posted, please.

  clemens



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?adf2mteo.fsf>