Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:20:01 +0200 From: Erik Winge <erik.winge@gmail.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_ural in 6.0-BETA1 Message-ID: <4cf221cc05090613208a72a08@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <05Jul18.130434cest.118130@fd.hif.hu> References: <4cf221cc050718035328cfb071@mail.gmail.com> <05Jul18.130434cest.118130@fd.hif.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On 7/18/05, =C1d=E1m Szilveszter dr. <adam@nhh.hu> wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Unfortunately, I see similar symptoms with two ral(4) based cards ( > Conceptronic C54RC) in two laptops, one running 6.0-BETA, the other > 7.0-CURRENT, both from 16th July. I have not yet been able to determine > under what conditions the random dissassociations occur, but no network > traffic is one way to more reliably trigger it. After the disassociation > occurs, wpa_supplicant starts scanning, even finds the AP a couple of > times, but fails to reassociate until killed and restarted. The AP is a > Linksys WRT54G with original Linksys firmware, and I am using a > WPA-PSK-based setup. I still have the same problem in 6.0-BETA4. if_ural will disassociate if the network connection is idle for more than a couple of minutes. This happens every time I leave my computer running without any network traffic. I also use WPA-PSK. Regards, Erik Winge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4cf221cc05090613208a72a08>