Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:39:19 -0700 From: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, <sjg@juniper.net> Subject: Re: 11.0 -r301815 to -r310873 using WITH_META_MODE=yes : an empty filename failure Message-ID: <64928.1465918759@kaos.jnpr.net> In-Reply-To: <ace89886-e99e-8fc4-93d2-dc3c7e22acb7@FreeBSD.org> References: <85435AE2-3F2C-4330-9751-729D99716A8C@dsl-only.net> <65e079c5-6b69-1b94-6bc8-ee32269cc98c@FreeBSD.org> <ace89886-e99e-8fc4-93d2-dc3c7e22acb7@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> wrote: > Actually it does seem to be meta-missing bug since $? (.OODATE) is empty > and yet it is requiring a .meta file. As I said; .meta files and targets that use $? (.OODATE) are fundamentally incompatible. Such a target will not work correctly, if meta_oodate returns TRUE so add .NOMETA or change the target to not use $?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?64928.1465918759>