Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 16:03:12 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: obrien@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Broadcom 44xx (Re: Rrrrrr.....) Message-ID: <200306021603.12652.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20030602010646.GB82304@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20030527190822.8E08137B401@hub.freebsd.org> <20030602010646.GB82304@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 10:36, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:08:22PM -0700, Bill Paul wrote: > > *NO*, the 44xx chips are *NOT* the same as the 57xx chips. The 57xx > > devices are 10/100/1000. The 44xx are 10/100 *ONLY*. > > Where is the 44xx showing up? A lot of newer laptops have it in them (Dell's are one in particular I am aware of) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200306021603.12652.doconnor>