Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:34:10 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Cc: "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Building 4.x releases on 5.x and 6.x Message-ID: <20041229223410.GB2628@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <41D32B59.3020108@wadham.ox.ac.uk> References: <41D31B8E.7030305@portaone.com> <41D31CEE.5040803@wadham.ox.ac.uk> <41D31EC9.5050909@portaone.com> <41D324EE.6070409@elischer.org> <41D3269D.6020406@wadham.ox.ac.uk> <41D32A23.1000304@elischer.org> <41D32B59.3020108@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 02:10:33PM -0800, Colin Percival wrote.. > Julian Elischer wrote: > >Colin Percival wrote: > >>ports/sysutils/makefs (borrowed > >>shamelessly > >>from NetBSD). > > > >yep that's it.. we REALLY should use this in the release. > > Last time this discussion arose, the conclusion was that we didn't want > to use ports in the release-building process if it could be avoided; and Hear hear... just things like the docproj port already give rise to premature baldness in re@ .... W/ (Alpha re builder at large) -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041229223410.GB2628>