Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 15 May 2010 17:02:42 +0200
From:      =?UTF-8?B?R3VzdGF1IFDDqXJleg==?= <gperez@entel.upc.edu>
To:        Weongyo Jeong <weongyo@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Call for Test and Review: bwn(4) - another Broadcom Wireless driver
Message-ID:  <4BEEB792.3040105@entel.upc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20100510195622.GA1295@weongyo>
References:  <20100228095259.GB3536@weongyo>	<20100301103240.3a4aac8a.ray@dlink.ua>	<20100303082833.GB22865@weongyo>	<20100303111014.6564ea1e.ray@dlink.ua>	<20100312231333.GZ1295@weongyo> <4BD2201E.3090409@entel.upc.edu>	<20100424231755.GI65380@weongyo> <4BD4A928.8020901@entel.upc.edu>	<20100506190653.GA31100@weongyo>	<58220.88.15.97.205.1273248485.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu> <20100510195622.GA1295@weongyo>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

En/na Weongyo Jeong ha escrit:
> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:08:05PM +0200, Gustavo Perez Querol wrote:
>>> Hello Gustau, I'm so sorry for belated response that I had no time to
>>> read and work email and wireless stuffs.
>>>
>>> Could you please test this symptom with attached patch?  It looks in
>>> CURRENT it missed to initialize a ratectl when it associates with AP.
>>>
>>   The patch made the machine to panic. I think it happened when launching
>> the supplicant. In fact, right now it works by putting the RF switch to
>> OFF. As soon as I change it to ON the machine panics.
>>
>>   It get a trap 12, with two reasons : page fault and "bufwrite, buffer is
>> not busy?"
>>
>>   I'm running 9.0/AMD64 from 1 of May (don't know exact svn revision).
>>
>>   Do you want me to test anything else ?
>
> OK.  The patch is ready to test.  Could you please test it with attached
> patch?
>
> regards,
> Weongyo Jeong
>

   It worked fine with current. I still haven't tested it a few hours,
let's see if it works. Thanks !

   However, right now I'm testing zfs with the same laptop (with a
different HDD) and unfortunately I'm seeing the same with STABLE.
Tons of :

             "bwn0: unsupported rate 0"

   I wonder if the patch you sent will work with stable's source code ...

   Regards,

   Gustau


- --
PGP KEY : http://www-entel.upc.edu/gus/gus.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=wEO7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BEEB792.3040105>