Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 12:42:37 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP! KSE needs more attention Message-ID: <20040607194237.GA10406@ns1.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <1086625355.10911.39.camel@builder02.qubesoft.com> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10406061551210.16558-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <40C37E1C.4000402@freebsd.org> <20040606204817.GB96607@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> <200406071014.21707.dfr@nlsystems.com> <20040607155645.GB66937@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> <1086625355.10911.39.camel@builder02.qubesoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 05:22:35PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > > > > > > Actually its a bit better than that. It works for most use cases right > > > now on i386 but would get confused on dlclose. I'll fix that before I > > > move it into current. > > > > Does it work on static bound executables? > > Which one is static bound The executable; you know, no rtld. What I call complete executable to distinguish it from static TLS on my page. Does static TLS work? See also: http://wiki.daemon.li/index.pl?ThreadLocalStorage -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040607194237.GA10406>