Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 06:48:54 -0700 From: LI Xin <delphij@delphij.net> To: Gaye Abdoulaye Walsimou <walsimou@walsimou.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why some ports still use openldap-client23? Message-ID: <485A63C6.5090304@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <4858C47F.20705@walsimou.com> References: <4858C47F.20705@walsimou.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9D353BDA100695FB1DC309A4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gaye Abdoulaye Walsimou wrote: > Hello list, > I'm just wondering why some ports are still using openldap-client23 (i.= e=20 > pam_ldap nss_ldap) instead of openldap-client24 ? > Is there any valid entry in make.conf to have openldap-client24 instead= =20 > of openldap-client23? You can set WANT_OPENLDAP_VER=3D24 in /etc/make.conf. I have requested a= n=20 experimental build for having 2.4 as default but that would consume some = time. We need to make sure that most port has their build issue=20 resolved before making the change (for most users this might not be a=20 problem, I personally run openldap 2.4 on my own servers since beginning = of this year). Cheers, --=20 Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! --------------enig9D353BDA100695FB1DC309A4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD4DBQFIWmPGOfuToMruuMARCnQHAJ964LJEeTQNCQcheB6YdcbHAnNP2QCTBTOs I+geu1/0zNSRd9YFOzmc2w== =eGrX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9D353BDA100695FB1DC309A4--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?485A63C6.5090304>